Exactly what are common risks associated with FDI in the MENA region

Exactly what are common risks associated with FDI in the MENA region

Blog Article

Recent research highlights the significant role that cultural differences play in the success or of foreign investments in the Arab Gulf.

Although governmental instability generally seems to dominate news coverage regarding the Middle East, in recent times, the region—and specially the Arabian Gulf—has seen a stable increase in international direct investment (FDI). The Middle East and Arab Gulf markets are becoming rapidly attractive for FDI. But, the present research on how multinational corporations perceive area specific dangers is scarce and often does not have depth, a well known fact lawyers and danger experts like Louise Flanagan in Ras Al Khaimah would probably be aware of. Studies on dangers associated with FDI in the area tend to overstate and mostly pay attention to political dangers, such as for instance government instability or policy modifications that could influence investments. But recent research has begun to illuminate a crucial yet often overlooked aspect, particularly the effects of social factors on the sustainability of foreign investments in the Arab Gulf. Indeed, a number of studies expose that many businesses and their management teams notably disregard the effect of cultural differences, due mainly to too little knowledge of these social variables.

Focusing on adjusting to local traditions is necessary however sufficient for effective integration. Integration is a loosely defined concept involving many things, such as for instance appreciating regional values, comprehending decision-making styles beyond a restricted transactional business perspective, and looking at societal norms that influence company practices. In GCC countries, successful business affairs are more than just transactional interactions. What impacts employee motivation and job satisfaction vary greatly across countries. Thus, to genuinely incorporate your business in the Middle East two things are essential. Firstly, a business mindset shift in risk management beyond economic risk management tools, as specialists and lawyers such as for instance Salem Al Kait and Ammar Haykal in Ras Al Khaimah may likely recommend. Next, strategies that may be effortlessly implemented on the ground to translate the new mindset into practice.

Recent scientific studies on dangers associated with international direct investments in the MENA region offer fresh insights, attempting to bridge the gap in empirical knowledge concerning the risk perceptions and administration methods of Western multinational corporations active extensively in the area. As an example, research project involving several major worldwide businesses in the GCC countries revealed some fascinating data. It suggested that the risks associated with foreign investments are a lot more complicated than simply political or exchange rate risks. Cultural risks are regarded as more essential than political, economic, or economic risks based on survey data . Moreover, the research unearthed that while aspects of Arab culture strongly influence the business environment, many foreign firms struggle to adapt to local customs and routines. This trouble in adapting is really a danger dimension that requires further investigation and a change in how multinational corporations run in the region.